For all of you bored with hitting penguins, here is
another little game (HTML + Javascript).
Quite simple and addictive. My record is about 26 seconds. I
recommend IE to run it, Mozilla seems to experience a few glitches with this
code.
For all of you bored with hitting penguins, here is
another little game (HTML + Javascript).
Quite simple and addictive. My record is about 26 seconds. I
recommend IE to run it, Mozilla seems to experience a few glitches with this
code.
This entry was posted on January 27, 2004, 1:53 pm and is filed under General. You can follow any responses to this entry through RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Arclite theme by digitalnature | powered by WordPress
#1 by Carlos Villela on January 27, 2004 - 3:33 pm
Damn you Cedric! Stop stealing my productivity! :))
#2 by The Occasional Blogger on January 27, 2004 - 3:35 pm
Cedrics Game
Cedric writes:
For all of you bored with hitting penguins, here is another little game (HTML + Javascript). Quite simple and addictive. My record is about 26 seconds. I recommend IE to run it, Mozilla seems to experience a few glitches with this c
#3 by Tim Downey on January 27, 2004 - 6:38 pm
True….these posts are deadly. I had no choice but to keep playing until I beat your score. 26.639.
Here’s more penguin fun. Penguins plus physics even…
http://www.bigideafun.com/penguins/arcade/spaced_penguin/default.htm
#4 by Anonymous on January 27, 2004 - 8:50 pm
just stay in safe corners
28.59 …
#5 by Stephane on January 28, 2004 - 8:20 am
63 seconds.
It would be much harder to stay alive if the game creator added a random move at the beginning. With the current version, after going south just when the game begins, you can go in the top-left corner and stay there 13 seconds without any trouble.
#6 by John Collins on January 28, 2004 - 9:04 am
Hint: Use a slower computer. I had no difficulties moving the box for several minutes until I got bored.
#7 by Mark Griffith on January 28, 2004 - 1:03 pm
My computer is too fast, and I only have a stick mouse on my laptop. I can only get 18 seconds.
mbg
#8 by Rob Misek on January 28, 2004 - 5:02 pm
In the spirit of your little games here is another one:
http://www.seethru.co.uk/zine/south_coast/helicopter_game.htm
Check out http://www.bbspot.com “Daily Links” to find more and more of these (among other great links).
#9 by Scott Carlson on January 29, 2004 - 7:53 am
Ok, for a random start to the game. Add this to the JavaScript, And change the movenemies() method as below….
var directions = new Array(8);
for (i = 0;i <8;i++)
{
directions[i] = getRandom(-20,20);
}
function getRandom(min,max)
{
return (Math.round(Math.random()*(max-min)))+min;
}
function movenemies()
{
….
//movenemy(0,-10,12);
//movenemy(1,-12,-20);
//movenemy(2,15,-13);
//movenemy(3,17,11);
movenemy(0,directions[0],directions[1]);
movenemy(1,directions[2],directions[3]);
movenemy(2,directions[4],directions[5]);
movenemy(3,directions[6],directions[7]);
….
}
#10 by Ryan on February 4, 2004 - 10:52 am
Looks like the “Back to my weblog” link broke it. :/ The borders are shifted down, but the code uses the old (higher) values.
I’m using Mozilla Firebird, but it worked beautifully before the link was added, so I’m guessing it should be an easy fix.
#11 by Ryan Barrett on February 4, 2004 - 2:42 pm
Thanks Cedric! Moving the link to the bottom worked beautifully.
#12 by Lucky Luke on February 5, 2004 - 3:18 am
45,64sec
#13 by BoB on February 5, 2004 - 3:38 pm
138,028sec It is true! 🙂 BoB
#14 by Armegalo on February 10, 2004 - 4:24 pm
Spotted the game at the top of the page – try this if you liked it…
http://www.armegalo.com/harvey/index.html
Rich
#15 by Lollibast on February 14, 2004 - 10:32 am
its not at all representative
i imagine playing it on a supercomputer
“your time: 0,03 sec”
#16 by Robert on February 16, 2004 - 8:06 pm
The game with the red and blue blocks is great, but we’ve noticed the timer is different on every machine! On one machine I get 25 seconds dying at the same place everytime, but I get 30 seconds on another computer.
Does anyone here know enough JavaScript to make it use a more reliable timer?
BTW, if anyone’s looking for another time-waster, check out my 3D minesweeper game (not crap like all the other 3D versions I’ve seen!).
http://www.software3D.com/Mines3D
Rob.
#17 by tom on February 18, 2004 - 3:51 am
quite poor that game
#18 by Travis on February 18, 2004 - 9:30 am
I got 52 seconds on this Escape! game. Anyone know any other games to play at work? I don’t want to get hit by the firewall again! 😉
#19 by me on March 5, 2004 - 12:29 am
24 seconds
most u prolly lying bout 63 ETC…
unless ur comp is crap
#20 by loren on April 29, 2004 - 12:10 pm
70.111 seconds 🙂
#21 by Shpits on January 4, 2005 - 5:21 am
You can also try my 3D Minesweeper…
Hope it’s not crap 😉
Enjoy..
http://www.angeltowns.com/members/shpitsmedia/3dminesweeperFrames.html
#22 by Anonymous on May 11, 2005 - 11:45 am
my record is 39,7 whats the highest?
#23 by Anonymous on May 11, 2005 - 11:47 am
i did on dsl 1024 and platform p4 3,0ghz
it was 39,7
#24 by WHO on December 14, 2005 - 12:55 pm
i got 30.678
#25 by escape artist on December 20, 2005 - 8:22 am
I’ve gotten 27.6 and it gets crazy starting at 26. The timer isn’t reliable. There should be a more reliable method to score this thing, such as the number of pixels traversed by one of the blocks. Unfortunately, the speed still varies wildy by machine. A flash version of this would probably be more consistent…
#26 by kiran on April 11, 2006 - 1:04 pm
I guess most of you dont believe. My record is 0.04seconds. I havent read comments, but I am trying to make it 0.01second.
#27 by kiran on April 11, 2006 - 1:06 pm
I wont believe this. Maybe the JavaScript didnt gave me the correct time. I got ‘0’ second.
#28 by kiran on April 11, 2006 - 1:07 pm
I wont believe this. Maybe the JavaScript didnt gave me the correct time. I got ‘0’ second.
PS: Cedric@Pair There was error in this page while I was posting
#29 by mosaic paradise on July 15, 2006 - 12:50 pm
Hi,
We
#30 by svrxkuca on May 31, 2007 - 4:20 am
qxsoysvb http://qhrirlae.com mahceweo klsrsvnm [URL=http://fvvkffxm.com]labxymlc[/URL] zsbyceeu
#31 by Rpg games on June 28, 2008 - 4:13 pm
Simple but amazing game. Yeah, i have to agree it’s quite addictive, it’s funny to see how we don’t need huge games with 3d graphics to have fun. I think the key is originality, kind of remind my how the copter game was cool when it was the first of it’s kind 😉
#32 by game design on May 21, 2009 - 7:22 am
13 secs 🙁
#33 by EZ PZ on June 9, 2009 - 3:31 am
228 seconds, able to get infinite amount of time if creator didnt make it so easy to cheat.